Nonfiction lives or dies on the quality of its research. The writing matters, the structure matters, but if the underlying facts are wrong or outdated, nothing else can save the book. Over the course of publishing dozens of titles across science, history, health, and technology, I have settled on a set of tools that I use for every project. None of them are exotic. Most are free. What matters is how they fit together.
Finding Sources
PubMed and Google Scholar are where most projects start. For science and health topics, PubMed gives me access to peer-reviewed medical and life science literature. Google Scholar casts a wider net across disciplines. I use both because they surface different results — PubMed is more precise, Google Scholar catches more cross-disciplinary work.
Semantic Scholar has become increasingly useful for following citation networks. When I find a key paper, Semantic Scholar shows me what cited it and what it cited, which helps me map the full conversation around a topic rather than just reading isolated studies.
Library databases fill the gaps. My local library system provides access to JSTOR, ProQuest, and several discipline-specific databases. For history titles especially, archival sources and primary documents live in these databases rather than in open-access repositories.
Verifying Facts
Original sources first. My rule is that every factual claim in a BellerBooks title must trace back to a primary source — the original study, the original dataset, the original historical document. Secondary sources are useful for context but insufficient for claims.
Cross-referencing. For any claim that is central to a chapter's argument, I look for independent confirmation from at least two sources. A single study can be wrong. Two independent studies reaching the same conclusion is much more reliable.
The recency check: Science moves fast. A statistic that was accurate three years ago may have been superseded. For every key fact, I check when the source was published and whether more recent data exists. This is especially important for health and technology topics where the landscape changes year to year.
Organizing Research
Zotero handles my citation management. Every source gets logged with full metadata, a link to the original, and my notes on what is relevant to the current project. When I am writing and need to reference a specific finding, I can search my Zotero library instead of digging through browser bookmarks.
Plain text notes for synthesis. I keep a running document for each project where I summarize findings in my own words, note contradictions between sources, and sketch out how different pieces of evidence connect to the book's argument. This document becomes the skeleton of the manuscript.
Staying Current
RSS feeds and journal alerts keep me aware of new publications in the subjects I write about. I subscribe to table-of-contents alerts from key journals so that relevant new research lands in my inbox rather than requiring me to go looking for it.
None of these tools are complicated. The value is in the discipline of using them consistently, for every project, without shortcuts. A good research process produces books that readers can trust. That trust is the foundation everything else is built on.
See the Books These Tools Built
Browse the full BellerBooks catalog — science, history, health, and technology for every age group.
Browse Books